How Well being Insurance coverage Protection in Georgia Compares to Different States

3 mins read

The share of People beneath the age of 65 with out medical insurance fell yearly between 2010, when the Reasonably priced Care Act was signed into legislation, and 2016, when President Barack Obama left workplace. Although the U.S. uninsured charge amongst People youthful than 65 has inched up through the years since, it stays effectively under the reported 17%+ figures within the years main as much as the ACA.

With out a common well being care program, most People beneath age 65 — the age of eligibility for Medicare — obtain employer-based medical insurance protection. Underneath this method, 10.8% of People youthful than 65, roughly 29 million folks, lacked medical insurance in 2019 — and that was earlier than the COVID-19 pandemic put over 22 million People out of labor.

Whereas most of these jobs have since been restored, the official uninsured charge for People youthful than 65 for 2020 will possible be greater than the 2019 charge.

In Georgia, an estimated 1,383,392 residents lack medical insurance protection — or 15.5% of the beneath 65 noninstitutionalized inhabitants, the fourth highest uninsured charge amongst states.

Throughout the state, 58.1% of the inhabitants beneath age 65 have employer-based insurance coverage, in comparison with 60.0% of the identical age group nationwide. One other 17.5% of the beneath 65 inhabitants within the state are insured via Medicaid, and 9.2% bought their very own insurance coverage straight — in comparison with the nationwide charges of 21.0% and 9.7%, respectively.

The rankings on this story are based mostly on one-year estimates of the proportion of People beneath 65 with out medical insurance from the U.S. Census Bureau’s 2019 American Group Survey.

Rank State Pop. beneath 65 w/o insurance coverage Pop. beneath 65 with employer-based insurance coverage Pop. beneath 65 with straight bought insurance coverage Pop. beneath 65 with Medicaid
50 Massachusetts 3.5% 68.1% 10.2% 23.0%
49 Rhode Island 4.8% 66.8% 11.7% 21.6%
48 Hawaii 5.0% 66.9% 9.9% 19.5%
47 Vermont 5.6% 60.6% 10.3% 25.8%
46 Minnesota 5.8% 69.8% 8.4% 18.9%
45 Iowa 6.0% 67.6% 8.5% 21.3%
44 New York 6.1% 60.2% 10.8% 26.9%
43 Wisconsin 6.8% 69.5% 8.8% 17.6%
41 — tied Maryland 6.9% 65.6% 9.3% 19.6%
41 — tied Michigan 6.9% 63.7% 8.9% 23.8%
39 — tied Pennsylvania 7.0% 65.1% 9.2% 22.0%
39 — tied Connecticut 7.0% 64.2% 8.5% 23.2%
38 New Hampshire 7.6% 68.8% 9.1% 14.6%
36 — tied Kentucky 7.7% 57.1% 7.3% 28.3%
36 — tied Washington 7.7% 63.7% 8.3% 21.4%
35 Ohio 7.8% 64.4% 7.3% 22.2%
33 — tied North Dakota 8.1% 68.3% 13.6% 12.4%
33 — tied Delaware 8.1% 63.6% 8.3% 23.0%
32 West Virginia 8.3% 57.4% 5.7% 30.0%
30 — tied Oregon 8.6% 61.4% 9.4% 23.0%
30 — tied Illinois 8.6% 64.9% 8.3% 19.7%
29 California 8.9% 56.9% 10.4% 26.4%
28 New Jersey 9.2% 66.4% 8.7% 17.4%
26 — tied Virginia 9.3% 64.4% 9.3% 14.5%
26 — tied Colorado 9.3% 62.4% 10.5% 18.1%
25 Nebraska 9.8% 67.2% 12.1% 13.4%
24 Maine 10.1% 61.4% 10.5% 20.2%
23 Montana 10.2% 55.0% 13.6% 23.6%
22 Indiana 10.3% 64.4% 7.8% 19.1%
21 Louisiana 10.5% 50.9% 8.4% 31.6%
20 Utah 10.8% 68.8% 12.5% 9.8%
18 — tied Kansas 10.9% 66.4% 10.1% 14.3%
18 — tied Arkansas 10.9% 51.4% 9.1% 29.1%
17 Alabama 11.7% 58.2% 9.7% 20.8%
15 — tied New Mexico 12.0% 46.1% 7.6% 37.0%
15 — tied Missouri 12.0% 63.3% 9.3% 15.6%
14 Tennessee 12.1% 58.4% 9.6% 21.0%
13 South Dakota 12.2% 61.8% 12.8% 14.2%
12 Idaho 12.8% 58.7% 12.9% 17.3%
11 South Carolina 13.2% 57.0% 10.1% 20.2%
9 — tied North Carolina 13.4% 56.7% 10.7% 19.2%
9 — tied Nevada 13.4% 59.4% 8.7% 18.9%
8 Arizona 13.6% 56.2% 8.5% 22.8%
7 Alaska 13.9% 55.0% 6.4% 22.8%
6 Wyoming 14.8% 62.6% 10.8% 12.3%
5 Mississippi 15.4% 50.9% 8.6% 25.1%
4 Georgia 15.5% 58.1% 9.2% 17.5%
3 Florida 16.3% 51.4% 14.2% 18.1%
2 Oklahoma 16.8% 54.8% 9.3% 18.7%
1 Texas 20.8% 54.8% 8.6% 16.2%

By: Samuel Stebbins, 24/7 Wall St. through The Middle Sq.

Leave a Reply

Previous Story

No-closing-cost mortgages might be costly

Next Story

This is the Typical Working American’s Emergency Financial savings Steadiness. Is It Sufficient?